#Nytimes election results professional#
“Many” people only use the phrase as a “metaphor,” the Times concedes through gritted teeth (it’s almost everyone, in fact), but “some” are serious.Īnd professional “experts in extremism” are very happy to give Times reporters quotes about how “ominous” this all is - though they also hedge relentlessly.ĭoes Trump realize he’s now just the Democrats’ stooge? Yet more than 500 million tweets get sent every day. Twitter posts with “civil war” rose 3,000% soon after the Mar-a-Lago raid, we’re told - eventually to learn that the trend peaked at 15,000 tweets an hour. Yet the piece is empty of anything you could call “evidence.”
“Use of ‘Civil War’ Soars After Mar-a-Lago Search” ran the front-page New York Times headline, above a story hyping a supposed right-wing obsession with a coming conflict, rife with the suggestion that widespread violence could be just around the corner.
The New York Times’ latest sad smear of Lee Zeldin on crimeīiden’s false pot narrative, Clarence Thomas & Malcolm X and other commentary NYT’s sugar-coating of Biden lies, MSNBC’s disaster lunacy and more Ex-NY Times opinion editor slams publisher: ‘He set me on fire and threw me in the garbage’
0 kommentar(er)
